Again, from Fawn. This is more information about how the permanent Sarbanes-Oxley 404(b) reprieve for non-accelerated filers was first voted down and then approved - both in the same meeting. More to come.
SOX 404(b) Debate Continued: More information from yesterday's meeting
Posted by
Teresa Bockwoldton June 16, 2010
Read More
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Tags: audit costs, Non-accelerated filer 404(b) information, Sarbanes-Oxley
This is a study from the SEC. It contains very interesting information on 404 and the benefits investors found in companies which complied with 404.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Tags: Sarbanes-Oxley Articles & Information, audit costs, Non-accelerated filer 404(b) information, Sarbanes-Oxley
Compliance Alert: Senate Negotiators Reject & then Accept 404(b) Exemption
Posted by
Teresa Bockwoldton June 15, 2010
I contacted Fawn who posted the following press release today:
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
A 2007 study from the SEC of the benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley is listed below. There are some excellent statistics about costing trends. Now, our solutions are extraordinarily less expensive than the costs listed below but the information presented below is very meaningful.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Tags: audit costs, Non-accelerated filer 404(b) information, Sarbanes-Oxley
From Jake Leon: Auditors, analysts and institutional investors again join forces to oppose SOX Section 404(b) waiver
Posted by
Teresa Bockwoldton June 15, 2010
Jake Leon from thecaq.com commented:
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Tags: Sarbanes-Oxley Articles & Information, Announcements, 404, 404 audit, audit costs, Non-accelerated filer 404(b) information, Sarbanes-Oxley Training, Sarbanes-Oxley for Non-Profits
